State Board Report
The recommendations of a joint NASBA/AICPA task force on accreditation of education were presented by NASBA Education Committee Chair Raymond N. Johnson and NASBA Vice President – Strategic Planning & Program Management Ed Barnicott at the 2017 Regional Meetings. In response to State Boards’ concerns about the ways higher education is changing, impacting its delivery and value, the AICPA/NASBA Accreditation Task Force began work in January 2016 with meetings with accounting program and regional accreditors.“Accreditation is very important,” Dr. Johnson stated. “We want colleges to innovate, to use technology, but to do so maintaining a high level of quality – and that is what we are depending on the accreditors to do.”
Dr. Johnson briefly discussed the Task Force’s 11 recommendations and explained they are only the beginning of the process. Representatives of NASBA and the AICPA are currently working on some of the recommendations with the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB), which accredits schools that account for approximately 60 percent of the CPA candidates. NASBA and the AICPA are also seeking to engage with other business accrediting bodies, including the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP), and International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education (IACBE).
The recommendations, as summarized by Dr. Johnson, include:
1. Within each programmatic accrediting body there should be a perpetual scan of accounting education, and education in general, by a standing committee composed of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators.
While the Task Force heard in engineering approximately 95 percent of licensees come from a program accredited school and in architecture approximately 97 percent come through a program accredited school, only about two-thirds of CPAs come through an accredited business program, Dr. Johnson noted. However, he added, there are good candidates coming through schools without program accreditation and the Boards need to be respectful of them.
Dr. Johnson said the most important of these recommendations for immediate action is the AACSB has said they will add professionals to their review teams — but they will need volunteers. AACSB conducts about 50 reviews of accredited accounting programs per year and one professional will be required for each of those reviews. Probably in the fall an official request for volunteers will be issued, and then in the spring of 2018 the AICPA will provide the training, so that the volunteers can be involved in the 2018-19 review cycle.
One of the NASBA Education Committee’s projects in the coming months is the establishment of a clearinghouse to bring the Boards’ complaints to the accreditors and get a reasonable response, Dr. Johnson reported. “The accrediting bodies do have a process for registering complaints, but we don’t know how robust that is,” he stated.
The AICPA/NASBA Accreditation Task Force’s co-chairs are Joanne Fiore and Carlos Johnson. Its members are Ed Barnicott, Tonya Flesher, Brentni Henderson, Yvonne Hinson, Raymond Johnson, Sharon Lassar and Steve Matzke. Jan Williams has served as the Task Force’s consultant.
- MEMBER CENTER
- Board Member Portal
- Member Products & Services
- Legislative Support
- Board Gateway Access
- PROC Resources
- Enforcement Tools
- NASBA Awards
- ED Login
- Meetings & Events
- CPA Exam Credit Extension
- NTS Extensions
- Continuous Testing Overview and Status Map
- CPA Exam
- International Qualification Examination (IQEX)
- CPA Australia
- Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ)
- Instituto Mexicano de Contadores Publicos (IMCP)
- Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA)
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS)
- South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA)
- Chartered Accountants Ireland (CAI)
- CPA Canada (CPAC)
- NASBA International Evaluation Services
- Exam News
- Products and Services