November 8, 2010 In this document you will find the Brief For Amicus Curiae of the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy in Support of Defendant. At issue in this case is the enforcement by the Alabama State Board of Public Accountancy (“ASBPA”) of its peer review requirements against the plaintiff, an Alabama CPA. ASBPA, like almost all other state boards of accountancy, generally requires CPA firms to undergo a peer review in connection with their application for renewal of their permit to engage in the practice of public accountancy. The Alabama legislature has provided that ASBPA may revoke, suspend or refuse to renew a CPA permit for “failure to comply with the provisions and requirements of (ASBPA’s) peer review program.” See Full Document: |
Related News |
- MEMBER CENTER
- EXAMS
- CPA Exam
- International Qualification Examination (IQEX)
- CPA Australia
- Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ)
- Instituto Mexicano de Contadores Publicos (IMCP)
- Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants (HKICPA)
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS)
- South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA)
- Chartered Accountants Ireland (CAI)
- CPA Canada (CPAC)
- NASBA International Evaluation Services
- Exam News
- Products and Services
- LICENSURE
- EDUCATION