<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NASBA &#187; Exposure Drafts &amp; Discussion Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nasba.org/blog/category/publications/exposure-drafts-discussion-papers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nasba.org</link>
	<description>National Association of State Boards of Accountancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NASBA Comments on Exposure Draft: Proposed Financial Reporting Framework for Small and Medium-Sized Entities 1/28/13</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2013/02/05/nasba-comments-on-exposure-draft-proposed-financial-reporting-framework-for-small-and-medium-sized-entities/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2013/02/05/nasba-comments-on-exposure-draft-proposed-financial-reporting-framework-for-small-and-medium-sized-entities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agoldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRF-SME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=34548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2013/02/05/nasba-comments-on-exposure-draft-proposed-financial-reporting-framework-for-small-and-medium-sized-entities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exposure Draft &#8211; Statement on Standards for CPE Programs</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/08/17/exposure-draft-statement-on-standards-for-cpe-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/08/17/exposure-draft-statement-on-standards-for-cpe-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>krooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPE Advisory Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPE programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Registry of CPE Sponsors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=23757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September 12, 2011 The Statement on Standards for Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Programs (Standards) is published jointly by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) to provide a framework for the development, presentation, measurement, and reporting of CPE programs. The Standards were last revised in&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/08/17/exposure-draft-statement-on-standards-for-cpe-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession Co-Chairs Statement</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/06/advisory-committee-on-the-auditing-profession-co-chairs-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/06/advisory-committee-on-the-auditing-profession-co-chairs-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lwells</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisory Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auditing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frofession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry M. Paulson Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=10477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession, appointed by the U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr., was asked to examine comprehensively the condition and future of the auditing profession, with emphasis on the sustainability of a strong and vibrant profession. In conducting its work, the Committee recognized that the prospects for the auditing profession&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/06/advisory-committee-on-the-auditing-profession-co-chairs-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Regional &#8211; Is the Uniform Certified Public Accounting Exam Uniform?</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/05/is-the-uniform-certified-public-accounting-exam-uniform/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/05/is-the-uniform-certified-public-accounting-exam-uniform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPA Exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[educational requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform CPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This paper examines the state, district, and territorial boards of accountancy educational requirements to sit for the Uniform Certified Public Accounting (CPA) Exam. This study undertakes an examination of general education, accounting and business related courses, at both the bachelor and graduate level, required by the various accountancy boards to sit for the exam. The&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2011/04/05/is-the-uniform-certified-public-accounting-exam-uniform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discussion Papers from the Ethics &amp; Strategic Professional Issues Committee</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/120710-discussion-papers-from-the-ethics-strategic-professional-issues-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/120710-discussion-papers-from-the-ethics-strategic-professional-issues-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit fees and engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Professional Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Independance Definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 7, 2010 The following Discussion Papers are from the Ethics &#38; Strategic Professional Issues Committee regarding the Audit Fees and Engagement Discussion and the Uniform Independence Definition Discussion. These papers monitor and evaluate the issues of the AICPA&#8217;s Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC), to harmonize ethics standards of State Boards of Accountancy with other regulatory&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/120710-discussion-papers-from-the-ethics-strategic-professional-issues-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UAA Exposure Draft &#8211; Firm Name Recommendation</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/12072010-uaa-exposure-draft-firm-name-recommendation/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/12072010-uaa-exposure-draft-firm-name-recommendation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Accountancy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[December 7, 2010 The AICPA/NASBA Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) Committee has worked over the past year to consider guidelines as to what are and what are not misleading CPA firm names. The proposed changes to the Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) and Uniform Accountancy Act Model Rules (Model Rules) in this exposure draft are the result&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/12/07/12072010-uaa-exposure-draft-firm-name-recommendation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Position Paper on Semi-Independent State Boards of Accountancy</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/semi-independent-state-boards-of-accountancy-position-paper-10222010/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/semi-independent-state-boards-of-accountancy-position-paper-10222010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jpotash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountancy Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Position papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semi-independent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 22, 2010 NASBA has developed this position paper because it is deeply concerned that the authority, the resources, and the reporting relationship to the state legislature and Governor are inappropriate or inadequate for many Accountancy Boards. If an Accountancy Board is not able to satisfy its public protection responsibility because it lacks financial resources&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/semi-independent-state-boards-of-accountancy-position-paper-10222010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audit Fees and Engagement Discussion Paper</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/discussion-paper-audit-fees-and-engagement-discussion-paper-october-22-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/discussion-paper-audit-fees-and-engagement-discussion-paper-october-22-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indepenence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Executive Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safeguards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Boards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 22, 2010 Monitor and evaluate the issues of the AICPA’s Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC), to harmonize ethics standards of State Boards of Accountancy with other regulatory bodies, to promote the development and adoption of UAA ethics provisions uniformly among the states, and to share with state boards emerging ethics and other professional issues.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/discussion-paper-audit-fees-and-engagement-discussion-paper-october-22-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discussion Paper Final Uniform Independence Definition</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/102210-discussion-paper-final-uniform-independence-definition/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/102210-discussion-paper-final-uniform-independence-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Ethics Executive Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 22, 2010 Monitor and evaluate the issues of the AICPA’s Professional Ethics Executive Committee (PEEC), to harmonize ethics standards of State Boards of Accountancy with other regulatory bodies, to promote the development and adoption of UAA ethics provisions uniformly among the states, and to share with state boards emerging ethics and other professional issues.&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/22/102210-discussion-paper-final-uniform-independence-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASBA Proposed Revisions to the UAA Exposure Draft</title>
		<link>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/05/102010-nasba-proposed-revisions-to-the-uaa-exposure-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/05/102010-nasba-proposed-revisions-to-the-uaa-exposure-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klsmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exposure Drafts & Discussion Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AICPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exposure Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firm names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposed Revisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Accountancy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nasba.org/?p=9455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 2010 The AICPA/NASBA Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) Committee has worked over the past year to consider guidelines as to what are and what are not misleading CPA firm names. The proposed changes to the Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) and Uniform Accountancy Act Model Rules (Model Rules) in this exposure draft are the result of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nasba.org/blog/2010/10/05/102010-nasba-proposed-revisions-to-the-uaa-exposure-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
